Sunday, December 11, 2005

Conflict of Interest. Like HER saying - My votes is FOR SALE. As in, a Member of the assembly - Being on the Payroll of a PRO-Dope Group when she may have to vote on an issue with DOPE. But, SOME People will do ANYTHING FOR MONEY $$$$$$. AND WHY DID THE RJ CHOOSE NOT TO MENTION IT IN THEIR ENDORSEMENT/ANNOUNCEMENT ARTICLE FOR HER? She Doesn't NEED A campaign Manager, as long as she will be reported about in the RJ. ACCURATE NEWSPAPER REPORTED Ended with the Demise of the Sun. What this County DOES NOT NEED IS MORE UNETHICAL POLITICIANS. I will email her a question to see if she is still on the PRO-Dope payroll and report back on her reply. IF there is one. On her website she has Endorsements listed - Wonder WHY she doesn't list the PRO-DOPE Group that is paying her a salary? Seems UNETHICAL to me - NOT to list it.
Is Chris Giunchigliani still on the PAYROLL of that PRO-Dope group? Doesn't sound ETHICAL TO ME TO BE TAKING MONEY ON QUESTIONS THAT MAY COME BEFORE THE ASSEMBLY. Seems that was UNETHICAL for her to work for them. Today's article about her - Failed to mention SHE was the one that Railroaded the Penalty Change for Dope from a Felony to a Misdemeanor. Why did she want it changed? Felon's CAN NOT VOTE so she picked up ALL the Potheads votes. Also, it SEEMS UNFAIR, AND UNNECESSARY FOR THE ARTICLE TO TRY TO HOOK Myrna Williams TO THE FEDERAL INDICTMENTS. I KNOW she is the Poster child for the RJ's Quest to Legalize Dope in NV, but - THEY SHOULD AT LEAST, TRY, TO BE FAIR.

Sunday, December 04, 2005

RJ Plea for Help

Poor Old Thomas Mitchell - He still doesn't get it. His article today was about THE GREAT JOB THE RJ IS DOING.

He doesn't mention - Giving the reader what they want or, Being Positive on Local Issues or, Ending the HATEFUL EDITORIALS.

NO. He blames - " Wall Street's demands for healthy profit margins no matter what."

He BRAGS  = "More than 47 million people visited online newspapers in September alone."
But here are Drudge figures =
009,611,442 IN PAST 24 HOURS267,669,032 IN PAST 31 DAYS3,537,637,224 IN PAST YEAR

Why is DRUDGE SO important to readers? HE give people WHAT THEY WANT.

Mitchell didn't mention the World Wide News Services like = FT or RSS.

He ends his column with = "We are working to make sure the Review-Journal will be relevant."

HOW? What changes have they made?

The REAL Problem with Writers is, they think, at least, 1,000Words can present ALL on ANY Subject.

One of the REASONS for the success of USA Today is - Short, to the point, Easy to understand articles.

RJ Writers seem to feel the MORE WORD they use, the better the article. NOT SO.