Thursday, August 30, 2007
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
Come on - Erin
Answer from Erin Neff - "I haven't given Gibbons a free ride. My column was focused on Bogden and his ouster thanks to Rove and Co."
=======
Easy to say, but YOU DIDN'T MENTION THE GIBBONS investigation in your article.
And, any possible connection between the Bogden Firing and the investigation.
Have YOU ever mentioned Abramoff - and Bogden firing?
Until YOU talk to Gibbons about Bogden - we are going to consider it, YOU giving hm a FREE Ride.
============
Q 4 - Erin Neff - HOW COME(?) you NEVER printed any of this before?
But YOU still are giving Gibbons a FREE RIDE.
WHY?
Plus, you didn’t mention Abramoff in the article today.
WHY?
Have YOU ever asked Bogden about –
the Gibbons investigation?
His investigation of Abramoff?
Probably NOT, and WHY hasn’t anyone in the NV media asked about it?
Posted on Blogger -http://4thelvrj.blogspot.com/
=======
Friday, August 24, 2007
Answer from John Smith - Thanks, John
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
WHO is writing the stuff for the Catholic League? ANN COULTER?
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Monday, August 20, 2007
Saturday, August 18, 2007
WHY WAS THIS NOT ON THE FRONT PAGE
Children who lack the required immunizations to enroll in school can obtain them for free at five local Wal-Marts starting today. at 4505 W. Charleston Blvd.
Special events will take place from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. and include free nutrition workshops, vision screenings and a fashion show. Vaccines will be available to children of all ages.
The shot campaign is a response to recent figures released by The United Health Foundation that identified Nevada as the state least likely to have young children with up-to-date immunizations.
BECAUSE WMART SELDOM ADVERTISES IN THE GREEDY RJ. The RJ didn't even put it on the front page. This is the sort of stuff I used to post on the RJ eForum - that they kicked me off for posting. I HOPE THE RJ STAFF GETS AUDITED by the IRS.Send me an Email = LVKen7@gmail.com
Friday, August 17, 2007
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
About Rove
Monday, August 13, 2007
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Tuesday, August 07, 2007
RJ sides with BIG GREEDY Oil against the People.
EDITORIAL One for you, 19 for me ...
On Saturday, the House passed $16 billion in new taxes on oil companies, while providing billions of dollars in tax breaks and incentives for renewable energy and conservation efforts.
"We are turning to the future," announced House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
The goal, obviously, is to make it less attractive to drill or import oil, and more
attractive to try and supply our energy needs with solar panels and windmills,
as well as to shift millions of acres to the production of corn for ethanol (while continuing to block the import of cheap ethanol from
*** Currently, there is a 50 cent a gallon tariff on imported Ethanol.
Now, those who actually work in the power business point out current technologies have the benefit that operators can "turn on more generation" in times of high demand -- whereas it's harder to order the sun to shine or the wind to blow when needed.
So what will Americans do
if the Democrats succeed in putting the oil companies out of business,
while waiting for new alternatives to spring up magically at their command?
*** GREEDY Oil is “putting – ITSELF - out of business,
"There's a war going on against energy from fossil fuels," says Rep. Ralph Hall, R-Texas. "I can't understand the pure venom felt against the oil and gas industry."
*** Go to the filling station and look at the PRICE OF GASOLINE.
Read the Financial Pages – that repeat – quarter after quarter
record GREEDY Oil Company Profits.
On his site he has a - Debt Calculator
The national debt on August 07: $8,943,049,360,658.01
Your share of the national debt: $29,559.35
There was more RJ, but who cares.
Monday, August 06, 2007
This is what the RJ wrote. I will add MY Comments - Preceeded by ***, and it RED.
Let me know what YOU think.
==============
RJ EDITORIAL: Culinary doesn't want new jobs? 8-6-07
But now the plan has hit an unexpected roadblock from an opponent Las Vegans might think would be four-square behind the job-creating development -- the Culinary union.
The union has
filed a
lawsuit
arguing that REI Neon
has not provided
evidence that it controls
or has agreements in place to purchase all the land in question.
The union wants a court to overturn all zone changes and general plan amendments
that they city granted REI Neon so it could move forward with the development, which would be located near the corner of
Lee Haney, a spokesman for REI Neon, claims the company has all the land under control.
"Every one of the parcels we have under option. We have eight figures invested. We have it under firm control."
In response to the
lawsuit, city officials last week were reviewing documents to make sure Mr. Haney is correct.
*** OK. Good for them.
The union maintains about 20 percent of the land in question is not under REI Neon control at this point.
*** Should be EASY to prove.
At the very least, the lawsuit could delay the project and increase its costs.
*** RJ BS
WHY would it increase the cost?
While REI Neon has filed a motion to dismiss the matter, the case won't be heard for at least another month.
So what exactly is the Culinary union up to?
*** Stand by – HERE COMES THE RJ ANTI-UNION BS.
Tellingly, union officials wouldn't comment for a Saturday Review-Journal story on the issue by David McGrath Schwartz. But the lawsuit notes that the Culinary's headquarters is within a half mile of the proposed development and that union staff and members regularly use a street that could be closed as part of the new project. Besides, the Culinary lawsuit claims, it is important that "a project is not speculative but rather is real."
But if you believe the Culinary's lame explanation for this legal action, you probably expect the tooth fairy to leave you a brand new Susan B. Anthony dollar under your pillow tonight.
In fact, the Culinary union cares about one thing and one thing only: expanding its membership and maintaining its power base.
*** MORE RJ BS
Creating well-paying jobs isn't enough if those jobs don't generate more union dues -- witness the Culinary's war with nonunion Station Casinos and its recent effort to scuttle a much-needed Station project near withering
*** war?
They are trying to unionize Stations.
Wonder why they call it a “war”.
And, indeed, once you cut through all the union pap, what's left? A source tells Mr. McGrath that the Culinary would drop the lawsuit if REI Neon agrees to let employees at future casinos on the site organize a union via the "card check" system rather than a secret election.
*** THE OLD – UNNAMED “SOURCE” PLOY.
THAT is the one BuSh used on WMD.
If the source is correct, this lawsuit is nothing more than a thinly veiled shake-down, the
type of extortion regularly perpetrated by thugs and mobsters.
*** YOU Might have missed the –
“If the source is correct,”
Whether or not REI Neon wants to run a union shop or not is up to them. But if the Culinary union has indeed used the taxpayer-funded judicial system to file a frivolous lawsuit designed simply to pressure REI Neon's management on the matter, a judge should not only toss this case out immediately, he should sanction the Culinary for such brazen nonsense.
*** They left out REWARD THEM IS THEY ARE CORRECT, BECAUSE IT WILL SAVE TAXPAYERS MONEY
Send me an Email = LVKen7@gmail.comSunday, August 05, 2007
No Social Secirity Number - GO HOME
As usual - The RJ Editorial gets it WRONG.
In their Editorial –
The Social Security Administration will notify employers and employees when a worker's W-2 data doesn't match the information in the government's database. If the worker can't resolve the differences and prove legal status within 60 days, businesses must fire the worker.
What they should have said was =
Business shouldn’t want a worker
that lied to get a job,
they shouldn’t want them working there,
and FIRE THEM IMMEDIATELY.
RJ - But it won't be enough to keep illegals out of the work force
Of course it would. No jobs = they quit coming. No need for deportation if there is NO Job for them. They would go back of their own free will.